My Tacoma handled great and it was 138 wheelbase. If it was shorter it would've probably worked better when doing the tight chicanes in a trail
My turning radius is already bad enough, so I don't want to go much longer. I also want to keep it a 1piece driveshaft, so can't go too long.
Feels weird to not be immediately revolted by the sight of an S10-chassis truck.
am i already fucking blocked from your shit.
come on ya fucking midg hazoosus lover
exactly. whatthefuck. hah
My turning radius is already bad enough, so I don't want to go much longer. I also want to keep it a 1piece driveshaft, so can't go too long.
Correct. This is a do-all vehicle. I plan on being able to do some remote camping, minor 4x4 stuff to get to the spots, and being able to turn tight and fit on those trails would be helpful hahaConcerns about turning radius = going slow.
I wouldn't attribute that into any thinking of said build. Now the drive shaft part makes more sense to me.
Correct. This is a do-all vehicle. I plan on being able to do some remote camping, minor 4x4 stuff to get to the spots, and being able to turn tight and fit on those trails would be helpful haha
Messed with the numbers a bit and I think this is where I landed on. 3.4deg at 12" bump and -1.33deg at 12" droop. Realistically I'll be at 10" bump and 8" droop, or 12" bump, 6" droop (approximately 18" bumped and strapped unless I can trade my 14s for 16s). I'll hopefully get to start mocking it all up by early next week and checking driveshaft plunge numbers.
View attachment 1203
Got the axle side upper and lower link mounts cut, along with the frame side lower link mounts and all their overlay plates/weld washers. But now that I'm typing this and looking at the pictures, I realize I need to cut one more set of axle side lower mounts. Not shown is the second set of frame side lower mount base plates. Had to shift the sheet over on the plasma table to fit them #smallshopproblems
View attachment 1198
View attachment 1199
I guess my the point I was trying to get across... You are building a truck very similar to mine. Steering radius has never been a problem. Going faster by having a good wheel base would be more important to me. I'm sure your truck is long enough though considering it's already a 4 door and you aren't trying to fit the shocks into the cab.
I was thinking the same thing. A simple bend, plating and welding would make that easy. Unless tire into frame is an issue.Sounds like an easy fix in the turning radius. Modify your radius arms to allow full steering
Cantilever with links. You won'tMy turning radius is already limited more than your truck. The stock sonoma frame is wider than rangers, and my radius arms are mounted directly under the frame. I mounted my radius arms as far out on the beam as I could, and didn't include a bend in the beam to allow the tire more clearance. I don't think I'm losing much turning radius, but I've always liked tight turning trucks. While I do want it to be able to cruise comfortably at speed, it's not going to be a full kill truck. Most fast truck wheelbases are in the 125-130" range, so I think I'll be fine. But yeah, I may have to shove the shocks in the cab to get a better motion ratio. Not too stoked about that, but I'll do it if I need to.
Sounds like an easy fix in the turning radius. Modify your radius arms to allow full steering
Cantilever with links. You won't
S10's are gay. Explorers are gay. I should have kept my Tundra.
Fixed for you Bodjie.
Man. I fucking love my truck, but i reaaaallllyyyy want a 4 door TTB rig with a bed on it...
Need a huge ferking caged dodge?