88’ Raingutter Ranger

MTSuarez

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2024
Messages
17
Looks like this is where all the cool kids migrated to from Race Dezert. Going to go through the current build on my 88’ Ranger from when I bought it back in 2018. There isn’t anything on the truck that hasn’t been redone or modified since I got it … no surprise there.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7849.jpeg
    IMG_7849.jpeg
    176.2 KB · Views: 56
  • IMG_3579.jpeg
    IMG_3579.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 36
  • IMG_3580.jpeg
    IMG_3580.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 29
  • IMG_3581.jpeg
    IMG_3581.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 33
Last edited:
I ran the truck for a few trips and ended up twisting Camburg’s unequal length kit. I was able to grab a Threat Motorsports kit from the swap meet and spent the next several months rebuilding it.

This was the last time I drove the truck at KOH 2020. Lack of uptravel and proper shock tuning in the rear caused significant bucking in deeper sections and the snowball began. Purchased a Camburg 4.0 housing that was wider than the front and decided to redo the front to match.
 

Attachments

  • 559D5089-1870-466B-8E2C-6651E037F6DC.jpeg
    559D5089-1870-466B-8E2C-6651E037F6DC.jpeg
    518.3 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_0144.jpeg
    IMG_0144.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 35
Last edited:
For the new front suspension I decided to swap to center mounted radius arms. Here’s some shots of the TE Designs 60” links and the center mounted radius arm crossmember from DIYOffroad getting welded up.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4627.jpeg
    IMG_4627.jpeg
    2.5 MB · Views: 33
  • IMG_4630.jpeg
    IMG_4630.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 25
  • IMG_1790.jpeg
    IMG_1790.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 24
  • IMG_2564.jpeg
    IMG_2564.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Crossmember/Links were done back in Jan 2022. Had started a new job and stopped progress until the following year. I purchased some longer Threat Motorsports Beams (now finding out maybe too long) and made custom top/bottom plates to hide their welds as well as an overlay plate.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3582.jpeg
    IMG_3582.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 22
  • 62FC4619-EAA6-4715-BB8D-F61E6981BD13.jpeg
    62FC4619-EAA6-4715-BB8D-F61E6981BD13.jpeg
    577.3 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_0390.jpeg
    IMG_0390.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 22
  • IMG_3583.jpeg
    IMG_3583.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 24
  • IMG_3584.jpeg
    IMG_3584.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 30
Last edited:
Here’s the housing that caused this whole snowball. Lucky enough to find the exact WMS 4.0 Camburg Housing I was looking for. Drove up and grabbed it from MMW. Thanks Erik!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3585.jpeg
    IMG_3585.jpeg
    775.6 KB · Views: 32
Was able to snag some 3.0"x16" Coils and 4.5"x18" Bypasses off Classifieds for a good deal. Bummer for everyone else that lowballed the guy 🤷‍♂️

Grabbed Bumpstops for the front and rear at another swapmeet.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3586.jpeg
    IMG_3586.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_3587.jpeg
    IMG_3587.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 26
  • IMG_3588.jpeg
    IMG_3588.jpeg
    397.8 KB · Views: 26
  • IMG_3589.jpeg
    IMG_3589.jpeg
    675.1 KB · Views: 28
With unequal length radius arms, drew up the arms in CAD and designed them around the shorter length. Slug was machined out by MitchMadeInc. Ended up trashing the radius arm to beam mount as the height was only 3.5", making designing the radius arm difficult. New mount sits at 5 1/4" tall for the bigger slug. With where the suspension cycles, the frame was notched and will be reinforced once everything is finalized. The driver side roll cage tie in sits lower and will need to be relocated, but thats a problem for another time.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3592.jpeg
    IMG_3592.jpeg
    362.2 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_3591.jpeg
    IMG_3591.jpeg
    35.1 KB · Views: 26
  • IMG_3590.jpeg
    IMG_3590.jpeg
    64.7 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_3593.jpeg
    IMG_3593.jpeg
    427.9 KB · Views: 47
and what WMS are you going for?
I was shooting for a track width of ~88 in the front and ~86 in the rear. The new beams I have are way wider than what I calculated to be so trying to navigate that issue at the moment.
 
Last edited:
Hope everyone had a good Thanksgiving. Warning on a long post about steering/swinger geometry.

I made new swingers to correct the steering geometry, but didn't really understand what I was doing so had to trash them. I have scoured forums and the internet without really finding a "Start to Finish" on getting zero bump steer as well as how to size and design the swingers on a dual swing steering system. The closest I got was "typically swingers are 9-10" long with the upper link 2-3" up from the bottom". There were great posts by @ChristianEwing and @85Yota on locating swingers with adjustable mounts (multiple holes) until they found the sweet spot.

I found WeaselMotorsports through Instagram and he had a great cardboard diagram that got me on the right track, he also went out of his way to send me a several minute video explaining how he achieved zero bumpsteer. I was pretty lost until then so I'll share what I've learned so far on the subject, feel free to correct me or add any tips to aid in the process.

Screenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.23.23 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.23.34 PM.png

From what I understand, the length of the swinger is chosen both by desired pivot location (where the top of the swinger is mounted) and leverage/throw of the steering. Beam mounts are usually 5-7" below the frame. To achieve zero bump steer, the beam mount should mirror that of the bottom link of the swinger so they swing in the same path. Designing a short swinger (5-7") would locate them below or very low on the frame as well as require more travel of the steering box to achieve a desired steering throw. The longer the distance between the pivot and the far link mount on the swinger, the less travel that is required out of the box as the far end has to travel faster. Same as spinning something around on the end of a string, the far end will be traveling farther/faster in relation to where your hand is. This is a Class III system with the pivot/fulcrum at the mount, effort/force on the middle link mount, and the load on the bottom link mount.

I decided on a 9" swinger (top pivot point to the bottom link mount hole) and the spacing of 2.5" from the bottom link hole. For every 1" the middle link pivot moves, the bottom moves ~1.4".

Screenshot 2024-10-20 at 4.33.24 PM.png

From there I needed to locate it on my frame. Ranger frame rails are not at all square in regards to inboard/outboard, so I drew up my frame in CAD (not necessary but definitely helps) and located my beam mounts based off measurements and overlay pictures. Because of this, it was very apparent that my driver side mount must be mounted closer to the frame, and vise vera for the passenger side to keep them correctly referenced off the beam mounts. Not using CAD is pretty easy, but we will discuss that once the bottom swinger link mount is aligned with the beam mount.

Screenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.06.37 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.06.53 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.07.07 PM.png

I stopped off at a hardware store and found 1" long bushings that had an OD of 3/4", and an ID of 1/2". This would fit into the 3/4" hole of my beam mount and continue to hold up the heim inside so I can still cycle the beam, and allow a 1/2" all-thread to be put through the center. You can cut the all-thread to length and tighten to the beam mount, with the bottom hole of the swinger being mounted on the all-thread. To clear straight tie rods, I found that a 6" spacing, from outside edge of beam mount to outside edge of swinger, worked to place the swingers. I took some 1" metal strips and cut 1/2" holes and cut them long. I overlayed them onto the 9" template I had and tacked them to each other at an angle that would easily clear the frame. From here, the beam/steering swinger pivots were on the same plane and now I needed to locate the top pivot off the frame.

Screenshot 2024-10-20 at 3.25.24 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-10-20 at 3.25.35 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-10-20 at 3.25.44 PM.png

I used CAD to do this part and found that the top pivot sat 1 1/4" inboard of the hole of the beam mount to clear the amount of travel I needed. When actually designing the mass of the swinger, you will need to calculate how much it needs to move in order to clear the frame. Based on the length of what I believed my steering rod mount on the knuckle will be, to get my desired steering angle the bottom pivot needed to move a total of 3.5". You can get more technical with that portion, I honestly just held a tape measurer with a piece of PVC pipe resting on the steering rod mount on my knuckle and measured how far it moved once it was at my desired steering angle. If your swinger contacts and you do not want to trim the frame or take any more material off the swinger, move the pivot farther outboard of the frame until it clears and match on the otherside. I took a 48" T-Square and placed it on the ground and aligned it with the beam mount. I swiveled the swinger until I was 1 1/4" inboard (just used a separate tape measurer) and tacked on a temporary mount to allow it to swing.

Screenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.09.15 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-10-20 at 5.09.24 PM.png

I'm tossing my D44 Knuckle setup and waiting to have my new kit mounted to start messing with the steering rod mount. Would love to hear some tips on that mount, I understand that how it will mount will naturally give it negative Ackerman since it has to point inboard to avoid hitting the wheel. Other than that, I can guess the height on the knuckle will effect the bumpsteer if its not inline with the center of the two points of where the beam attaches to it, and the length will effect the speed of the knuckle turning (anything geometry wise this changes as well?)

Thanks everyone!
 
Had some Blitzkrieg Knuckles for a long time and with costs of hubs/brakes I decided to just stick with the system I had until recently. I've redone so many things that I'm trying to do a better job of doing things right the first time, so I steered away from welding a longer steering linkage mount onto the cast knuckles. Was able to grab some Camburg 2.5" Front Hubs and will need a bit of TLC and some smaller rotors to fit in my wheels.

The Snout was just slightly oversized for the Knuckle and had them machined at a local shop. Finally was able put a tire on for the first time in over a couple years so that was rewarding to say the least. Waiting on some more ball joints so I can start messing with the steering linkages once both knuckles are on.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3149.jpeg
    IMG_3149.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 22
  • IMG_3206.jpeg
    IMG_3206.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 28
  • IMG_3536.jpeg
    IMG_3536.jpeg
    2.4 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_3622.jpeg
    IMG_3622.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 33
If he is actually going for 88 wms to wms like he said above, that’s super wide. My 4.5 over A arm kit puts me at 69” (haha no really) wms to wms on my 1G Tacoma.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top